neu = weird version of 'neve'
future imperative; ends in o
- eco
- adito
similis - takes dative
etiam - also functions like 'yes'
"how" = "explain" = needs to supply evidence
outline 3 ways = doesn't need evidence. it's not an analyse level of thing. one and a half pages is too much
make sure your points are not that close
in latin, not punished for overdoing the question
2 marks -> 2 points to be safe
"state the form and usage of negare" = give grammar, e.g. "infinitive, indirect statement"
"Analyse how Virgil depicts Dido's feelings in these extracts", then notice how the 3 extracts are from the start (of what??), a bit after the start,
continuers: 3 hours
extension: 2 hours
analyse = how these extracts fit into the text (i think i wrote about this already)
juvenal is 3 times as long as horace but will get equal representation in the text; large swathes of junvenal will go unexamined
you can get 15/15 for writing just 3 (full) pages (1 booklet) for the extended response. in the same vein, you can get 12 for writing 6 whole pages (2 booklets). (or 0 for this one person that basically talked about roman history for 3 pages instead of answering the question)
REMEMBER THAT BOLD AND UNBOLDED MEAN DIFFERENT THINGS FOR LATIN AND LATIN EXTENSION
Yiming's strategy
- in the reading time, do unseen
- then do the unseen first
- then do the other questions
- and when you get to the unseen you will have a fresh perspective on it and maybe understand things like the gold/shoulders
Mr Brophy did his HSC question by question. so he doesn't think about questions in the background. I do that though, for every exam, so I can think about it in the background.